<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><default:channel xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/"><title>Satisfaction and Unsatisfaction towards Microsoft</title><link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/</link><description></description><dc:language xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">en-UK</dc:language><admin:generatorAgent xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" rdf:resource="http://www.blog.co.uk"/><sy:updatePeriod xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">8</sy:updateFrequency><sy:updateBase xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/vista_seem_not_to_be_very_attractive_to_~1549908/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/various_sources_link_to_the_insuperiorit~1549887/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_a_worthy_upgrade~1520957/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_money_what_microsoft_cares~1520936/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_really_good_as_mention~1520871/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_symantec_antivirus_really_worth_what_~1520181/"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/unsatisfaction_with_microsoft~1520155/"/></rdf:Seq></items></default:channel><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/vista_seem_not_to_be_very_attractive_to_~1549908/"><default:title>Vista seem not to be very attractive to many users!</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/vista_seem_not_to_be_very_attractive_to_~1549908/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-13T15:56:11+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;When I explore the internet and look over the comments of people using Microsoft products, they seem not very content too with the use of the software! Why? Because of the too much power it used. With the introduction of Vista which had more capabilities and functinos, it need quite a lot of space and power to run. New PC nowadays tend to have a high capacity HD but old PC tend not. Hence if upgraders are thinking of upgrading the PC to Vista; think about its space consumed and thus other than buying the software for an upgrade, you may also spend $$$ which is not worth; on buying hardware to be compliant with the new Windows.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Still and still there is seldom people say about their intention to change to the recent product, Vista but vow to continue their stand in using Microsoft Windows XP! Emm..... I agree to this......&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Though and though, the most shocking news I have heard so far if people is still running Windows 98 claiming it to be more stable than any of the products ever introduced... I myself dont know about that and lets see if the sales of the Microsoft recent production; Vista really made it way successfully into the market while many open-source rivals are already in the market.....
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/vista_seem_not_to_be_very_attractive_to_~1549908/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>When I explore the internet and look over the comments of people using Microsoft products, they seem not very content too with the use of the software! Why? Because of the too much power it used. With the introduction of Vista which had more capabilities and functinos, it need quite a lot of space and power to run. New PC nowadays tend to have a high capacity HD but old PC tend not. Hence if upgraders are thinking of upgrading the PC to Vista; think about its space consumed and thus other than buying the software for an upgrade, you may also spend $$$ which is not worth; on buying hardware to be compliant with the new Windows.</p>
	<p>Still and still there is seldom people say about their intention to change to the recent product, Vista but vow to continue their stand in using Microsoft Windows XP! Emm..... I agree to this......</p>
	<p>Though and though, the most shocking news I have heard so far if people is still running Windows 98 claiming it to be more stable than any of the products ever introduced... I myself dont know about that and lets see if the sales of the Microsoft recent production; Vista really made it way successfully into the market while many open-source rivals are already in the market.....
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/vista_seem_not_to_be_very_attractive_to_~1549908/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/various_sources_link_to_the_insuperiorit~1549887/"><default:title>Various sources link to the insuperiority of Symantec Antivirus software</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/various_sources_link_to_the_insuperiorit~1549887/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-13T15:47:13+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;From few sources like PC World and other recommended sites who rates world antivirus(Top) it never seem Symantec Antivirus had ever top the chart..... Nevertheless of such comment, they(Symantec) seem to boost about their superior software which is unimaginable not true if what I have heard so far came to be true.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Many users of Symantec software seem to be very unpleasant with their experience towards the use of the software and the most troublesome part is always the uninstallation part that always rocks off your PC which usually need to be oversome by re-formating the PC.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Based on this view and my survey from the entire Internet, Symantec Antivirus seem not a pleasant choice to choose if you are considering an antivirus software!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/various_sources_link_to_the_insuperiorit~1549887/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>From few sources like PC World and other recommended sites who rates world antivirus(Top) it never seem Symantec Antivirus had ever top the chart..... Nevertheless of such comment, they(Symantec) seem to boost about their superior software which is unimaginable not true if what I have heard so far came to be true.</p>
	<p>Many users of Symantec software seem to be very unpleasant with their experience towards the use of the software and the most troublesome part is always the uninstallation part that always rocks off your PC which usually need to be oversome by re-formating the PC.</p>
	<p>Based on this view and my survey from the entire Internet, Symantec Antivirus seem not a pleasant choice to choose if you are considering an antivirus software!!
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/13/various_sources_link_to_the_insuperiorit~1549887/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_a_worthy_upgrade~1520957/"><default:title>Is Windows Vista a worthy  upgrade?</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_a_worthy_upgrade~1520957/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-06T14:48:16+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;It seem not to me after looking at the news below:&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128252/article.html"&gt;http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128252/article.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I would recommend users of Microsoft Windows XP not to shift to Windows Vista for your benefit!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_a_worthy_upgrade~1520957/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>It seem not to me after looking at the news below:</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128252/article.html">http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,128252/article.html</a></p>
	<p>I would recommend users of Microsoft Windows XP not to shift to Windows Vista for your benefit!!
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_a_worthy_upgrade~1520957/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_money_what_microsoft_cares~1520936/"><default:title>Is money what Microsoft cares?</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_money_what_microsoft_cares~1520936/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-06T14:43:47+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;After a long years of promoting their software, it seem there are quite a number of people who are unsatisfied with the services that Microsoft provide! Firstly, everything talked about money! Any problem, give them a call, MONEY! Cannot solved; give another call, MONEY again!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Why not try some Linux system and Apple system? They seem to have improved security which had long been implemented before Microsoft introduce it in their latest operating system, Vista!! Refer: &lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/11/vista.security.ap/index.html"&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/11/vista.security.ap/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;I personally had not tried Vista of course and with so much news about its flaws and etc, I think I begin to feel a change in operating system is needed for me and it seem not worth it to buy Vista...... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_money_what_microsoft_cares~1520936/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>After a long years of promoting their software, it seem there are quite a number of people who are unsatisfied with the services that Microsoft provide! Firstly, everything talked about money! Any problem, give them a call, MONEY! Cannot solved; give another call, MONEY again!</p>
	<p>Why not try some Linux system and Apple system? They seem to have improved security which had long been implemented before Microsoft introduce it in their latest operating system, Vista!! Refer: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/11/vista.security.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/11/vista.security.ap/index.html</a></p>
	<p>I personally had not tried Vista of course and with so much news about its flaws and etc, I think I begin to feel a change in operating system is needed for me and it seem not worth it to buy Vista...... </p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_money_what_microsoft_cares~1520936/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_really_good_as_mention~1520871/"><default:title>Is Windows Vista Really Good as mention?</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_really_good_as_mention~1520871/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-06T14:29:27+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;Oh my god! See how many flaws are there in this new Windows? Take years to make one new windows and Microsoft always assured that their new product have enhanced security!!! See what happens here!!!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/26/microsoft.security.ap/index.html"&gt;http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/26/microsoft.security.ap/index.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Will Microsoft be able to give a sense of secureness for both business and home user? I wonder!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_really_good_as_mention~1520871/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>Oh my god! See how many flaws are there in this new Windows? Take years to make one new windows and Microsoft always assured that their new product have enhanced security!!! See what happens here!!!</p>
	<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/26/microsoft.security.ap/index.html">http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/ptech/12/26/microsoft.security.ap/index.html</a></p>
	<p>Will Microsoft be able to give a sense of secureness for both business and home user? I wonder!</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_windows_vista_really_good_as_mention~1520871/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_symantec_antivirus_really_worth_what_~1520181/"><default:title>Is Symantec Antivirus really worth what the price quote?</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_symantec_antivirus_really_worth_what_~1520181/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-06T10:56:46+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;I am also one of the user of Symantec Antivirus for quite a long time. Imagine carrying a computer without antivirus! It always give me the fear of losing all my valuable data after hearing tons and tons of the effect of losing information/data due to virus. With this issue, I had always stand side by side with top-notch antivirus nominated by the market and that is the Symantec Antivirus which most of you have ever heard of.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Symantec had a very strong reputation in their antivirus software and most people I feel may be cheated by this reputation. To my very first point. How many benefits it brought to you by purchasing this program? Well here is what I am going to say.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;System crashing..... Slow booting......System slowing down.... and so on........ Well I am not too fancy on these and so I ignored all these and continue to use their product until its version at 2006. All these issues can be tolerate by me but finally my only reason to purchase this program disappeared! Why? MY COMPUTER HAD ALREADY BEEN AFFECTED BY VIRUS wihout knowing it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;How do I know? By scanning using other antivirus software! Currently I am using Avast Free Edition. This software is indeed great! Auto-updates with no trouble! Free from virus since on. There is lots more top-rated antivirus around voted by people such as NOD32, panda and etc which I had never tried so I cant review on this!&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;My advise is NOT TO BUY symantec products anymore.... Being the most expensive antivirus in market bears you no protection as strong as those of free edition by other vendors! So why spent money on such products? Try those free editions and you may like it!!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_symantec_antivirus_really_worth_what_~1520181/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>I am also one of the user of Symantec Antivirus for quite a long time. Imagine carrying a computer without antivirus! It always give me the fear of losing all my valuable data after hearing tons and tons of the effect of losing information/data due to virus. With this issue, I had always stand side by side with top-notch antivirus nominated by the market and that is the Symantec Antivirus which most of you have ever heard of.</p>
	<p>Symantec had a very strong reputation in their antivirus software and most people I feel may be cheated by this reputation. To my very first point. How many benefits it brought to you by purchasing this program? Well here is what I am going to say.</p>
	<p>System crashing..... Slow booting......System slowing down.... and so on........ Well I am not too fancy on these and so I ignored all these and continue to use their product until its version at 2006. All these issues can be tolerate by me but finally my only reason to purchase this program disappeared! Why? MY COMPUTER HAD ALREADY BEEN AFFECTED BY VIRUS wihout knowing it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
	<p>How do I know? By scanning using other antivirus software! Currently I am using Avast Free Edition. This software is indeed great! Auto-updates with no trouble! Free from virus since on. There is lots more top-rated antivirus around voted by people such as NOD32, panda and etc which I had never tried so I cant review on this!</p>
	<p>My advise is NOT TO BUY symantec products anymore.... Being the most expensive antivirus in market bears you no protection as strong as those of free edition by other vendors! So why spent money on such products? Try those free editions and you may like it!!
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/is_symantec_antivirus_really_worth_what_~1520181/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item><default:item xmlns:default="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" rdf:about="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/unsatisfaction_with_microsoft~1520155/"><default:title>Unsatisfaction with Microsoft!!</default:title><default:link>http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/unsatisfaction_with_microsoft~1520155/</default:link><dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2007-01-06T10:44:40+01:00</dc:date><default:description>	&lt;p&gt;It has been a long time since I used Microsoft products. With technologies become more and more improved and so with the growing use of open-source programs eg:Firefox, Microsoft Products may have receive a very strong hits not only in use but also in sales. To maintain the sales, updates are a necessary factory to whichever software maker so that customers may gain satisfaction with the improved technologies and functions but how far can it goes and achieve its intention?&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;The latest introduction of Microsoft office 2007 had debut into the market bringing fresh view on its programs in every terms. It was seem beautifully decorated at the first glance but the question arise here is "Ease of use". I had been trying Microsoft office for quite sometime and find the previous release Microsoft Office 2003 of more ease of use than the latest Microsoft office 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;Why do I say like that? Well, the answer is quite simple. Two words - where and how. Since I had used Microsoft office applications for quite sometime, its indeed difficult even for me to use this latest software. Unlike its previous version, every functions and locations of buttons can easily be located by me. But with this new office, everything seem a blow towards my experience. I no longer can find which buttons I am looking for due to the main factor "Change in locations" of the buttons.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;No longer is there file, edit, etc in the menu bar.... Now is started with Home, Insert etc and the "File" was replaced by a nice Microsoft office Logo! Looking at first sight may think the logo is sort of for decoration but if look indepth, it may not.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;There is more issues with this latest release but I stop here at the moment while I research more. &lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;p&gt;But based on my opinion, this software is not worth an upgrade! If you had Microsoft office 2003 on your computer, you may find it more easier to use than the latest release!
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;small&gt; &lt;a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/unsatisfaction_with_microsoft~1520155/#comments"&gt;Comments&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/small&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</default:description><content:encoded xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><![CDATA[	<p>It has been a long time since I used Microsoft products. With technologies become more and more improved and so with the growing use of open-source programs eg:Firefox, Microsoft Products may have receive a very strong hits not only in use but also in sales. To maintain the sales, updates are a necessary factory to whichever software maker so that customers may gain satisfaction with the improved technologies and functions but how far can it goes and achieve its intention?</p>
	<p>The latest introduction of Microsoft office 2007 had debut into the market bringing fresh view on its programs in every terms. It was seem beautifully decorated at the first glance but the question arise here is "Ease of use". I had been trying Microsoft office for quite sometime and find the previous release Microsoft Office 2003 of more ease of use than the latest Microsoft office 2007.</p>
	<p>Why do I say like that? Well, the answer is quite simple. Two words - where and how. Since I had used Microsoft office applications for quite sometime, its indeed difficult even for me to use this latest software. Unlike its previous version, every functions and locations of buttons can easily be located by me. But with this new office, everything seem a blow towards my experience. I no longer can find which buttons I am looking for due to the main factor "Change in locations" of the buttons.</p>
	<p>No longer is there file, edit, etc in the menu bar.... Now is started with Home, Insert etc and the "File" was replaced by a nice Microsoft office Logo! Looking at first sight may think the logo is sort of for decoration but if look indepth, it may not.</p>
	<p>There is more issues with this latest release but I stop here at the moment while I research more. </p>
	<p>But based on my opinion, this software is not worth an upgrade! If you had Microsoft office 2003 on your computer, you may find it more easier to use than the latest release!
</p>
<p> <small> <a href="http://chrisfoo.blog.co.uk/2007/01/06/unsatisfaction_with_microsoft~1520155/#comments">Comments</a> </small> </p>]]></content:encoded></default:item></rdf:RDF>
